Workable vs Greenhouse: which should you choose?
Quick answer: Workable is built for smb-hiring, while Greenhouse suits structured-hiring. For most users Greenhouse is the stronger default, but Workable can be the better fit depending on your budget and use case. Greenhouse has the lower entry price.
Both Workable and Greenhouse get recommended a lot, but they solve the job differently. Below we compare them on pricing, strengths and the use cases each one fits, then give a clear verdict.
Side-by-side
| Workable | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ats | Ats |
| What it's known for | Fast-to-deploy ATS with one-click posting to 200+ job boards, AI sourcing and built-in HR features for growing companies. | Structured-hiring ATS built around interview kits, scorecards and data-driven, bias-reducing recruiting workflows favoured by scaling tech teams. |
| Pricing | Pay-per-Job ~$99/job/mo; Standard ~$299/mo, Premier ~$599/mo, Enterprise ~$719+/mo (flat monthly, unlimited active jobs on subscription tiers) | Custom quote only, no public list; third-party estimates from ~$6,500/yr for small headcounts into six figures for 1,000+ employees, scaled by headcount and modules |
| Best audience | SMBs and growing companies that want fast setup and wide job-board reach without a sales process. | Scale-ups and tech companies that want rigorous, structured, data-driven hiring across many roles. |
| Best for | smb-hiring, job-board-distribution | structured-hiring, scale-ups |
| Entry price | ~$99/job/mo | ~$6,500-$10,000/yr est. |
| Biggest strength | Fast to deploy with transparent, published flat-monthly pricing (rare in ATS). | Best-in-class structured-hiring framework that enforces consistent, data-driven interviews. |
| Main caveat | On the Standard tier, texting, video, assessments and performance reviews are paid add-ons. | No public pricing; quote-only and priced by headcount so cost rises as you hire even if hiring volume does not. |
Features compared
Where they really diverge is in the day-to-day feature set:
Workable key features
- One-click posting to 200+ job boards (Indeed, LinkedIn, Glassdoor and niche boards)
- AI sourcing with passive-candidate matching, automated outreach and resume parsing (all tiers)
- Built-in one-way and live video interviewing (Premier)
- Candidate texting/SMS (Premier)
Greenhouse key features
- Structured-hiring workflow built around interview kits and scorecards
- Customizable hiring stages, approvals and permissions
- Candidate sourcing automation and CRM-style talent pipelines
- Advanced reporting and hiring analytics (deeper on higher tiers)
Pricing tiers side by side
Workable plans
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Pay-as-you-go (per job) | ~$99/job/mo | For occasional single-role hiring |
| Standard | ~$299/mo ($3,588/yr) | Unlimited active jobs; texting/video/assessments are paid add-ons |
| Premier | ~$599/mo ($7,188/yr) | Bundles texting, video interviews, assessments, referrals, performance reviews |
| Enterprise | ~$719+/mo ($8,628/yr) | Adds SSO, dedicated success manager, advanced workflow controls |
Greenhouse plans
| Plan | Price | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Core (formerly Essential) | ~$6,500-$10,000/yr est. | Core ATS for organizations under ~100 employees; quote-only |
| Plus (formerly Advanced) | ~$15,000-$35,000/yr est. | Adds structured interview kits, custom workflows, advanced permissions for mid-market |
| Pro (formerly Expert) | ~$40,000-$100,000+/yr est. | Enterprise analytics, API access, dedicated support; quote-only |
Tiers compiled from the vendors' published plans and independent reviews; prices are approximate and change often, so confirm current figures (and your region's taxes) on each vendor's site.
Strengths compared
Where Workable wins
Sign up and post to hundreds of job boards the same day, with self-serve published pricing.
- Fast to deploy with transparent, published flat-monthly pricing (rare in ATS).
- Huge job-board distribution with one-click posting.
That makes it the stronger pick for sMBs and growing companies that want fast setup and wide job-board reach without a sales process.
Where Greenhouse wins
The reference standard for structured, bias-reducing hiring at scaling and tech-forward companies.
- Best-in-class structured-hiring framework that enforces consistent, data-driven interviews.
- Largest integration ecosystem (~400+), roughly double most competitors.
That makes it the stronger pick for scale-ups and tech companies that want rigorous, structured, data-driven hiring across many roles.
Verdict: choose by fit
Both are good at the job, so let your priorities decide.
- Choose Workable if you fit its core audience — sMBs and growing companies that want fast setup and wide job-board reach without a sales process.
- Choose Greenhouse if you fit its core audience — scale-ups and tech companies that want rigorous, structured, data-driven hiring across many roles.
FAQ
Is Workable better than Greenhouse?
Greenhouse is the stronger default for most users, but Workable can be the better fit depending on your budget and use case.
What is the main difference between Workable and Greenhouse?
Workable is sign up and post to hundreds of job boards the same day, with self-serve published pricing. Greenhouse is the reference standard for structured, bias-reducing hiring at scaling and tech-forward companies.
Which is cheaper, Workable or Greenhouse?
Entry pricing differs: Workable starts at ~$99/job/mo, while Greenhouse starts at ~$6,500-$10,000/yr est.. Compare the tiers above against your usage.
Sources
Facts above are drawn from these independent reviews and the vendors' own pages for Workable and Greenhouse: